You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day November 1, 2006.
- Comparative religion (3)
- Culture & society (75)
- History (28)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (32)
- Science and faith (114)
- Uncategorized (44)
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
- July 31, 2011: The Problem with Embracing All Religions
- July 8, 2011: Why do you call God your father?
- June 1, 2011: About Being Basically Good
- May 1, 2011: Lizards and the Law
Blogroll
Chat
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for November 1, 2006
Academic Science & Students
November 1, 2006 by Dr. Mc.
Nov 2 begins a conference at which Dr. Elaine Howard Ecklund presents findings from her year-long study of Religion Among Academic Scientists (RAAS). Collecting data from 1,646 academics in natural and social science from 21 major universities, she makes some interesting observations. As one might expect, 60% of scientists poled identified themselves as atheist or agnostic compaired with 8% of the general population. What I found more interesting was her observation among these scientists that, “Childhood religious backbround, not exposure to scientific education, seems to be the most powerful predictor of future irreligion.” That suggests to me that scientific education is less than compelling in its irreligious arguments. But it also suggests that irreligious persons are more likely to go into academic science professions than the general population. Perhaps it is only that religious persons are less likely to get through the filter to become academic scientists. I hope that is not the case, but it certainly sounds like my personal experience. Also interesting is that those surveyed indicated greater interest among students to discuss religion with their teachers, and teachers would like materials to help them with the discussion. This is good? It may depend on what help they get. They feel ill equipped for the discussion, but if they mean they want materials to defend their own view..
Dr. Echlund provides a good summary of her findings here, but access is only for subscribers to the Chronicle of Higher Education.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »