You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day April 1, 2007.
- Comparative religion (3)
- Culture & society (75)
- History (28)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (32)
- Science and faith (114)
- Uncategorized (44)
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
- July 31, 2011: The Problem with Embracing All Religions
- July 8, 2011: Why do you call God your father?
- June 1, 2011: About Being Basically Good
- May 1, 2011: Lizards and the Law
Blogroll
Chat
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for April 1, 2007
Belief v. Science
April 1, 2007 by Dr. Mc.
In the second century AD it was obvious to sky-watchers that planets did not move in a consistent straight line across the sky, but it was also unarguable that the earth was the center of the universe. Ptolemy used epicycles to explain this retrograde motion, and gave science the justification for its pre-conceived ideas that would last for a millennia and a half. Never mind that this required a condition never before observed in nature–that an object could orbit around nothing while the nothing orbited around something. This convoluted solution was necessary, because the alternative, simpler solution, that the earth moved around the sun, was at that time chimerical. This demonstrates not only that observation can be strongly subservient to pre-conceived ideas, but also that rational, “scientific” support for beliefs, even untrue ones, can and will be found, if people simply want to believe them enough.
Posted in Culture & society, History, Science and faith | No Comments »