You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day October 14, 2007.
- Comparative religion (3)
- Culture & society (75)
- History (28)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (32)
- Science and faith (114)
- Uncategorized (44)
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
- July 31, 2011: The Problem with Embracing All Religions
- July 8, 2011: Why do you call God your father?
- June 1, 2011: About Being Basically Good
- May 1, 2011: Lizards and the Law
Blogroll
Chat
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for October 14, 2007
NOMA v. Reality
October 14, 2007 by Dr. Mc.
I heard it again from another evolutionist: "We must keep body, mind and spirit separate. All three have their place, but distinct from each other." Others distinguish only two categories, saying "Faith and Science" must remain in distinct domains. What I really find disturbing, is when so-called Christians say it. They hope to avoid conflict, but do not realize that they have bought into a line from atheism. If these two can be separated with no affect, it is only because one is real and the other is not. Guess which one the atheists think is not real. You can always divorce yourself from considering an unreal belief, but you cannot separate reality into two non-overlapping parts. It was refreshing to hear both parties in the Dawkins-Lennox"God Delusion" Debate state that NOMA is not even a consideration. (Please note that the creator and number one proponent of NOMA is an atheist.) Non-Overlapping Magisteria only exists in concept, and the two minds that came against each other that evening could agree on that if nothing else. Both agreed that science infringes upon matters of faith and that faith infringes upon matters of science. That is why Dawkins can justify his rejection of God based on science, and it is why Lennox can justify his faith in God based on science. The real delusion is upon Christians who would rather have peace than truth.
Posted in Science and faith | No Comments »