- Comparative religion (3)
- Culture & society (76)
- History (28)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (33)
- Science and faith (115)
- Uncategorized (44)
- February 8, 2012: The War on Religion
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
- July 31, 2011: The Problem with Embracing All Religions
- July 8, 2011: Why do you call God your father?
- June 1, 2011: About Being Basically Good
Blogroll
Chat
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
The Problem with My Spouse
Language is an indicator of culture, and I hear married couples unintentionally giving ground in the culture war. The word “spouse” is handy for referring to unspecified married partners, just as “sibling” is useful in referring to either a brother or sister. When addressing a mixed audience, I might say, “Take time to talk with your spouse.” I might use the plural when addressing a mixed audience about our spouses. But why would I ever say anything about “my spouse?” I am a male. My wife is a female. She is my wife—a much more specific term. “When addressing an entire audience of married women, I should speak of their husbands, not their spouses. I don’t remember hearing this generic term substituted for husband or wife in decades past, but now I hear it much too often on and off stage. Why does it matter? Aren’t people just being lazy in their speech? I don’t think so. Who wants to blur the lines about whether a male is married to a female or that a female is married to a male? If I allow the terms “wife” and “husband” to drop from my vocabulary, I have taken a giant step backwards from valuable ground in the culture war.
November 7, 2011 at 10:18 pm
Well, I’m sorry AcademicFreedomBlog, but I’m going to have to disagree with you about this one. I’m in favor of those who identify themselves as homosexual having the same privileges as those of us who identify ourselves as heterosexual. What’s sacred, I think, is the commitment one person makes to another on account of love. This is the same glue which binds God to God’s people, I believe. My own denomination recognizes this.
Frankly, I’ve seen homosexual couples honor who this bond more sincerely than some heterosexual couples (e.g., Kim Kardashian). In my belief system, anyone who aspires to the same level of commitment which God made to Israel (cf. what Paul has to say to the Corinthians) deserves our respect.
I don’t honestly see how same-sex couples who make and honor this commitment can possibly detract from opposite-sex couples who do the same.
Do you? I’d be interested in your thoughts on this, Dr. Mc.